Friday, November 14, 2008

Marriage Protection Amendments

It has become increasingly important to recognize the threat to Family Values and the roles that mothers and fathers play in raising their children both as an intact family and broken family following divorce, which is implied by same-sex unions and marriage.

A study done by the The Traditional Values Coalition:

gives a breakdown of marriage values in all fifty states:

SPECIAL REPORT: 50-State Survey Of Marriage Protection Amendments
UPDATED REPORT, November 2008

At this writing, 30 states have constitutional amendments banning same-sex marriage. Forty-one states have laws banning same-sex marriage either by statute or by amendment.

TVC supports constitutional amendments that ban both homosexual marriage and homosexual civil unions—which provide the same legal benefits to homosexuals as married couples under the law. It is clear that much work needs to be done to defend marriage not only at the state level but at the national level through a constitutional amendment. A federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) protects states from being forced to recognize out-of-state homosexual marriages.

Alabama: A constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage was approved in June, 2006.

Alaska: Defense of Marriage Act is law and part of the state constitution. ACLU is suing to force the state to grant marriage benefits to unmarried couples.

Arizona: Voters passed a marriage amendment on November 4, 2008

Arkansas: On Nov. 2, 2004, voters passed a constitutional amendment that bans homosexual marriage and forbids any civil unions or other unmarried arrangements synonymous to homosexual marriage. Vote was 75% to 25%.

California: Voters passed Proposition 8 on November 4, 2008 that defines marriage as a one-man, one-woman union in the California state constitution.

Colorado: Voters approved a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage in 2006.

Connecticut: The Connecticut Supreme Court mandated homosexual marriage in October 2008.

Delaware: DOMA as state law; no constitutional amendment.

Florida: Voters passed a marriage amendment to the Florida constitution on November 4, 2008.

Georgia: On Nov. 2, 2004, voters passed a marriage amendment by a 76% margin and bans civil unions. It is being challenged by homosexuals.

Hawaii: Constitutional amendment bans same-sex marriage but state grants limited benefits to same-sex partners.

Idaho: Voters approved a marriage amendment in 2006.

Illinois: DOMA enacted but constitutional amendment failed.

Indiana: State law prohibits same-sex marriage.

Iowa: DOMA as state law. Senate voted down constitutional amendment protecting marriage. A new marriage amendment has been submitted.

Kansas: Voters on April 5, 2005 passed a constitutional amendment defining marriage as a one man, one woman union. It passed by a 70% margin.

Kentucky: Voters on Nov. 2, 2004 passed a marriage amendment by a 75% margin. It bans homosexual marriage and civil unions.

Louisiana: DOMA as state law. Voters approved constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage and civil unions by 4-to-1 margin. Vote overturned by liberal judge on Oct. 5, 2004. The case is in now in court awaiting a decision.

Maine: DOMA as state law. Constitutional amendment failed in House and Senate.

Maryland: State law prohibits same-sex marriage.

Massachusetts: In 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ordered the legislature to enact a law granting marriage to homosexuals. In July, 2008, the Massachusetts legislature voted to remove residency requirement for out-of-state homosexual marriages.

Michigan: On Nov. 2, 2004, voters passed an amendment banning same-sex marriage and civil unions by a 59% margin.

Minnesota: DOMA as state law but constitutional amendment failed when legislature ad- journed in May without voting on it. A marriage amendment is under consideration in 2005.

Mississippi: On Nov. 2, 2004, voters passed an amendment by an 86% margin. It bans same-sex marriage and does not recognize homosexual marriages from other states. Does not ban civil unions.

Missouri: DOMA as state law and written into the state constitution.

Montana: On Nov. 2, 2004, voters passed an amendment banning same-sex marriage by a 67% margin. ACLU is suing for spousal benefits for homosexuals. Does not ban civil unions.

Nebraska: DOMA is in the state constitution. ACLU sued to overturn amendment. In May, 2005, a federal judge declared DOMA unconstitutional. He was overruled in 2006 and the amendment was reinstituted.

Nevada: DOMA written into the state constitution.

New Hampshire: State law bans same-sex marriage.

New Jersey: In 2006, Gov. Jon Corzine signed a bill permitting homosexuals to enter into civil unions.

New Mexico: Legislature killed marriage amendment in 2005.

New York: No DOMA. Bills recognizing or banning same-sex marriage have been intro- duced but none have passed yet. ACLU and Lambda Legal are suing for “right” to marry homosexuals.

North Carolina: An amendment was submitted in 2005.

North Dakota: 73% of the voters on Nov. 2, 2004 chose to amend the constitution to ban homosexual marriage and any other counterfeit of marriage, including civil unions.

Ohio: 62% of the voters on Nov. 2, 2004, voted to ban same-sex marriage and civil unions.

Oklahoma: 76% of the voters on Nov. 2, 2004, voted to protect marriage. The amend- ment bans any homosexual marriage/civil unions. Homosexuals are suing to overturn federal DOMA.

Oregon: 57% of the voters on Nov. 2, 2004, passed a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. Does not ban civil unions.

Pennsylvania: DOMA as state law; constitutional amendment to be introduced.

Rhode Island: No DOMA. State Attorney General says state constitution mandates ho- mosexual marriage.

South Carolina: Voters passed marriage amendment in 2006.

South Dakota: Voters passed a marriage amendment in 2006.

Tennessee: Voters passed a marriage amendment in 2006.

Texas: Voters passed an amendment protecting traditional marriage in November 2005.

Utah: 66% of the voters on Nov. 2, 2004, voted to protect marriage by banning homosexual marriage and civil unions.

Vermont: Homosexual civil unions are legal in this state. No DOMA has passed.

Virginia: Marriage amendment was passed in 2006.

Washington: DOMA as state law.

West Virginia: DOMA as state law. Law challenged by ACLU but it is upheld by state Supreme Court.

Wisconsin: Voters passed a marriage amendment in 2006.

Wyoming: Wyoming has a statute protecting marriage. The legislature killed an amendment effort in 2005.

Planned Parenthood’s Child Molester Cover Up EXPOSED!

Life Dynamics, Inc. (LDI), in partnership with Traditional Values Coalition, is providing irrefutable proof that Planned Parenthood (PP) is deliberately covering up the sexual molestation of girls!

Sexual activity with underage girls is illegal in all 50 states—yet Life Dynamics discovered that Planned Parenthood counselors are willing to cover up sexual crimes against underage girls by adult males!

LDI encouraged a team of girls to call PP clinics and pretend to have been sexually abused by adult males. In case after case, PP counselors willingly ignored state law to cover up these molestations and violations of statutory rape laws! These conversations were taped by LDI.

Each PP clinic that has covered up child molestation must be prosecuted! For additional information on the LDI’s Child Predator project, go to:

Listen to these tapes and make up your own mind about the motives of Planned Parenthood officials to cover up the sexual molestation of girls!

Click here for index of tapes and transcripts

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Liberalism is a Mental Disorder by Michael Savage

Liberalism is a Mental Disorder: Savage Solutions

By Michael Savage

Dr. Michael Savage, sage prophet of the airwaves, has been diagnosing liberal mental illness for more than a decade. Now, in his third and most insightful book, he strikes at the root of today's most desperate issues, providing a hefty dose of his unique conservative medicine, including:

  • Homeland security: "We need more Patton and less patent leather. . .Real homeland security begins when we arrest, interrogate, jail, or deport known operatives within our own borders. . .One dirty bomb can ruin your whole day."

  • The ACLU, National Lawyers Guild, and "I believe it's time for the heads of . . . left-wing agitation groups who are using the courts to impose their will on the sheeple to be prosecuted under the federal RICO statutes."

  • Illegal immigration: "I envision an Oil for Illegals program. . .The president should demand one barrel of oil from Mexico for every illegal alien that sneaks into our country."

The Doctor is in and the diagnosis is clear. Read “Liberalism is a Mental Disorder” and find out what you can do to treat it.

Liberalism is a Mental Illness, Findings of Top Psychiatrist

Liberals Clinically Mad, Concludes Top Psychiatrist
Eminent doctor makes case leftist ideology is a mental disorder

Posted: November 12, 2008
6:33 pm Eastern

© 2008 WorldNetDaily

WASHINGTON – Just when liberals thought it was safe to start identifying themselves as such, an acclaimed, veteran psychiatrist is making the case that the ideology motivating them is actually a mental disorder.

"Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded," says Dr. Lyle Rossiter, author of the new book, "The Liberal Mind: The Psychological Causes of Political Madness."

"Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave."

While political activists on the other side of the spectrum have made similar observations, Rossiter boasts professional credentials and a life virtually free of activism and links to "the vast right-wing conspiracy."

For more than 35 years he has diagnosed and treated more than 1,500 patients as a board-certified clinical psychiatrist and examined more than 2,700 civil and criminal cases as a board-certified forensic psychiatrist. He received his medical and psychiatric training at the University of Chicago.

Rossiter says the kind of liberalism being displayed by both Barack Obama and his Democratic primary opponent Hillary Clinton can only be understood as a psychological disorder.

"A social scientist who understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity – as liberals do," he says. "A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population – as liberals do.

And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which over-regulates and over-taxes the nation's citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state – as liberals do."

Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:

  • creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;
  • satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;
  • augmenting primitive feelings of envy;
  • rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.

"The roots of liberalism – and its associated madness – can be clearly identified by understanding how children develop from infancy to adulthood and how distorted development produces the irrational beliefs of the liberal mind," he says. "

When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious."

Monday, November 10, 2008

Barack Obama Official Blog Website Approves False DV Stance

If Barack Obama and Joe Biden and the DNC did not support this warped hatred of men, it would not appear here on the Official mybarack Obama website.

In America 75% Rates At Which Batterers Get Custody Of The Children
By Indianashame Teardropsforkatelynn - Nov 8th, 2008 at 11:26 am ESTComments
Mail to a Friend Report Objectionable Content________________________________________
Tags: abuse, abuses, child, civil, constitutional, discrimination, Domestic, human, rights, violence

Rates At Which Batterers Recieve Custody
by Joan Meier, Esq.

One statement in Breaking the Silence: Children's Voices that has provoked controversy was my statement that "the studies are showing" that up to 2/3 of accused or adjudicated batterers receive joint or sole custody in court. While no empirical study can definitively determine a universal statistical rate, the key point is that the research consistently shows that accused and adjudicated batterers receive joint or sole custody disturbingly often. This confirms the anecdotal experience of domestic violence attorneys and victims around the country. The following research supports this perspective.

Go to the website (BEFORE OBAMA ERASES IT FROM HIS WEBSITE LIKE BEFORE) and read his anti-father stance and support for radical feminism.

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Family Values Reaffirmation = Family Court Reform

Family Values Reaffirmation = Family Court Reform

Tens of millions of voters across 4 states, stood up for Family Rights, Marriage and Adoption Rights on Tuesday, November 4, 2008. We prevailed even in the state where the Kool-aid soaked brains of the libtards drank deep the lies of Obama and Biden.

The Family Court Reform / Foster Care Reform movement missed the Great Tidal Wave that swept out the anti-family agenda of the same-sex libtards in California, Florida, Arizona and Arkansas. The way to fixing the courts lies with the conservative movement.

We now have the first president-elect that grew up Fatherless in America. And his values show that in his choice of father-figures who he listened to and shaped his complete lack of moral fortitude and personal integrity as a man. His is the politics of convenience, the ultimate end justifies the means.

This is a man raised in a single parent home. He married a woman who hates America.

Despite efforts by me and a few others in this and other groups, Family values, such as the reaffirmation of Traditional Family values, such a Marriage and the rights of Foster Kids to a time-tested, one man, one woman home were mostly ignored, with the exception of a few family rights reformists.

All family court reforms groups could have easily piggybacked onto the Family Values bandwagon, but failed to respond positively to any family values blogs posted. On Saturday, November 1, I stood with about 200 good citizens on a street corner, and raised my sign and voice for family values. The same happened all over the state of California, Florida, Arizona and Arkansas where the forces of evil, and child abuse tried to redefine the moral virtue of marriage, and the raising of children into some kind of sexual-based union.

The best interest of children is served by the marriage of one man, one woman. Nothing else can ever replace that, or even come close individuating a child to adulthood then to model for them what is best for them, a loving mom and loving dad.